Locals strongly oppose Himachal plant, India

Locals strongly oppose Himachal plant, India
Published: 27 June 2010

On June 23 2010, the Chairman of the National Environment Appellate Authority (NEAA) made a visit to the Lafarge Cement and Limestone Mines project site in order to assess the feasibility of the Environment Clearance granted to the project last year on 8th June 2009.
 
The Environment Clearance to the project has been challenged by two separate petitioners, Pratap Singh Thakur and Ganga Singh Thakur who have filed their appeals, challenging the Environment Clearance, with the NEAA. The most critical argument being made by the petitioners is that the negative socio economic and environmental impacts of the project have been completely overlooked by the Environment Impact Assessment Report  and the Ministry of Environment and Forest’s ‘Expert Advisory Committee’ while recommending clearance to Rs. 900 crore, 3 MTPA  greenfield project.
 
“While the Expert Advisory Committee of the Ministry did make a site visit in May 2009 after objections raised by us and all affected communities, the committee did not visit the actual mining site nor did it meet any of the affected persons and granted the Environment clearance in June 2009″ said Shri Pratap Singh Thakur. The counsel for Pratap Singh Thakur, Supreme court environmental lawyer Shri  Ritwick Dutta has argued that the very purpose of the MoEF committee’s site visit was defeated by such a superficial visit. Based on this, Appellate Authority member Shri J.C Kala on 13th May 2010 had ordered that he himself would undertake a visit to the project site in June and carry out a detailed assessment by interacting with the affected people.
 
During the site visit the Shri Kala visited Shakrori, located opposite the proposed plant site, Thalli (adjacent to the plant site, Bagshyad and Kanda (at the mining site) and had discussions with the local people. More than 200 people had gathered at Thalli, and strongly opposed the setting up of the plant given the productive agriculture of the area – which they claim would be adversely affected by pollution from the plant. At Bagshyad, a gathering of 400 people dominated by women also presented their concerns and grievances to Shri Kala.
 
The mining site is said to affect 16 villages of 3 Panchayats – Balindi, Bagshyad and Bindla, as they will lose part of their agricultural lands and most of their forest lands under the category of Demarcated Protected Forest. Natural groves of pomegranate trees are a substantial source of horticultural produce from the area. Fruit trees such as apricot, peach, almond, pear, mango, jamun, banana apart from fuel and fodder species also add to the local biodiversity. Apart from this the mining activity will indirectly affect, with its solid waste and pollution generation, all the villages in the Alsindi valley downslope of the Pheridhar ridge.
 
Source: Himvani